(Reprinted from Amboy Beacon, Feb. 2, 2011)
PERTH AMBOY — Local businesswoman Wilma Matey, who was on-vacation recently
when no member of the City Council voted in-favor of awarding a three-year,
$293,356 contract last week for animal-control services offered by Happy
Home Shelter Inc., which she serves as Acting Director, last week accused two
of the Councilmen who voted against it of a conflict-of-interest.
Under advice of City Law Director Mark Blunda, Councilmen William Petrick
and Kenneth Gonzalez — who moved and seconded the measure for discussion
purposes — abstained from voting on it to avoid “the appearance of a potential
conflict-of-interest.”
The Council’s three other members — Councilmen Fernando Gonzalez and Joel
Pabon and Council President Kenneth Balut — all voted “no.”
The “appearance of a potential conflict-of-interest” arose because of a
backyard barbecue held at Matey’s Water Street home.
Matey had contended that the event was a Cinco de Mayo celebration, but
resident Alan Silber countered that the party was identified as a “campaign
rally” on the website of Moving Forward Together, a campaign ticket in the May
2010 election consisting of Council candidates Petrick, Kenneth Gonzalez and
Maria Garcia.
The city’s strict “pay-to-play” regulations are now applicable to Petrick
and Gonzalez as Council members.
Last week, Matey contended that Balut and Fernando Gonzalez “have a
conflict-of-interest” and should abstain from voting on a multiplicity of issues,
including matters dealing with the Police Department, taxi-drivers and
liquor-licenses because of campaign-contributions they had received in the May
2008 election.
“You guys had pig-roasts and everything-else,” she said. “It’s not fair
that I be singled-out.”
“I don’t see any conflict whatsoever,” Blunda said.
Neither Fernando Gonzalez nor Balut went-into-detail about why they cast
negative votes, but Pabon said he voted to reject the proposal because of
“unanswered questions.”
The Happy Home proposal was submitted by Matey almost a year ago after the
Council rejected an earlier proposal by Woodbridge Township to take-over the
city’s animal-control services, as it had done for Carteret and South Amboy.
No comments:
Post a Comment