(Reprinted from Amboy Beacon, Dec. 22, 2010)
SOUTH AMBOY — At a hearing last week before Superior Court Judge Phillip
Paley, sitting in New Brunswick, it was ordered by the Judge that six
“misplaced” provisional ballots from the disputed Nov. 2 South Amboy mayoral
election be opened and counted.
This was done at the Middlesex County Board of Elections Headquarters on
Jersey Avenue, New Brunswick, with the determination that three votes were
cast for City Council President Fred Henry, the Democratic nominee for Mayor,
and three votes were cast for Independent candidate for Mayor Vincent Mackiel.
In the tie-vote contest between Henry and Independent candidate Mary
O’Connor, that left Henry with a three-vote lead prior to individual ballot
challenges, which were scheduled for Monday, Jan. 10, at 8:30 a.m. before Paley
after a telephone conference with the Judge two days after the hearing.
Attorneys Michael Baker represented Henry, and Christopher Struben
represented O’Connor at the hearing. Representing the Board of Elections was Deputy
Attorney General Donna Kelly.
Struben had asked that the six ballots, which were discovered following a
recount requested and paid-for by O’Connor, not be counted because “the
security and integrity of the ballot procedures were not followed” in that all
of the “affirmations” were torn from the envelopes which held the ballots.
Kelly said the Board had kept the ballots locked inside a room in its
Jersey Avenue offices within an envelope.
“The question is, ‘Were the ballots compromised during the past 6
weeks?’” Paley said.
Turning to the lawyers, the Judge asked, “What if there was solid-proof of
security? Would you accept the ballots?”
Kelly replied that she directed the Board to put the opened ballots inside
another envelope, and “they were put in a box and locked in a closet.” She
went-on to explain the process of maintaining a provisional ballot.
There were 22 provisional ballots submitted, three of which were voided by
the Board’s staff after painstaking research of the registration rolls. But
of the 19 remaining ballots that should have been put-through the scanner,
there were only 13 the day they were counted by the Board.
Kelly maintained that everything was “done according-to procedure,” and
that there was “no indication that any unauthorized person had access to the
ballots.”
Thus, she said, there were “six valid votes that need to be counted.”
Baker agreed with Kelly. He also stated that “no one slipped-in any
ballots.”
Struben disagreed and stated, “The problem here is security of the ballots.”
He maintained that the “chain-of-custody” was broken when the six ballots
were lost, and again when they were found and opened.
Struben went-on to cite the law, which states that if there is any
discrepancy and the ballots in-question would change the result, the court has to
hear them.
Paley said he wanted “all the votes to be counted” and so-ordered.
Following that, Struben “will have the right to challenge the results” of the
counting.
The Judge set Thursday, Dec. 16, at 4 p.m. as the date and time for a
conference call with the attorneys regarding any challenges and another court
date.
With that, O’Connor, members of her team and her attorney went to Jersey
Avenue for the opening and counting of the six “misplaced” provisional
ballots, while the only person from Henry’s team who attended the counting was
Baker. Henry and his team were in court, but they did not go to Jersey Avenue.
At the Board’s office, the ballots were opened and counted.
After the Council meeting which followed the the opening and counting of
the six ballots but was before the conference call, Henry explained that he
left without going to Jersey Avenue because “I was happy to get out of there.
“The ballots weren’t counted the first time, and they should have,” he
said. “I don’t think they were tampered-with in any way. I think they got the
count right this time.”
Henry said that “it’s the American way of doing things that all the votes
are counted,” and “to suppress them as she (O’Connor) wanted to do is
wrong.”
Asked if he was ready to be sworn-in at the Council Reorganization, which
City Clerk Kathleen Vigilante said will be held on Wednesday, Jan. 5, Henry
replied, “At this point, yes.”
After the conference call, Paley scheduled another hearing on votes that
were cast and not counted, votes that were not cast, and allegations that some
of the voters do not live in South Amboy.
No comments:
Post a Comment